For instance, a hypothesis h : ¬ ∀ x, ∃ y, x ≤ y will be transformed by push_neg at h into
h : ∃ x, ∀ y, y < x. Variables names are conserved.
This tactic pushes negations inside expressions. For instance, given an assumption
h:¬∀ε>0,∃δ>0,∀x,|x-x₀|≤δ→|fx-y₀|≤ε)
writing push_neg at h will turn h into
h:∃ε,ε>0∧∀δ,δ>0→(∃x,|x-x₀|≤δ∧ε<|fx-y₀|),
(the pretty printer does not use the abreviations ∀ δ > 0 and ∃ ε > 0 but this issue
has nothing to do with push_neg).
Note that names are conserved by this tactic, contrary to what would happen with simp
using the relevant lemmas. One can also use this tactic at the goal using push_neg,
at every assumption and the goal using push_neg at * or at selected assumptions and the goal
using say push_neg at h h' ⊢ as usual.